SMSF comparison
SMSF vs Rest: fees, control and breakeven
By Tim Roff, Founder & SMSF Specialist · Updated
Rest is the retail-industry hybrid serving 1.8M+ Australians. Its 'Member Tailored' platform offers some direct share access — but as with every industry fund, you don't actually own the underlying assets or set the strategy.
EOFY Special — 50% off SMSF setup
Offer ends midnight AEST, 1 July 2026. Applies to Individual and Corporate Trustee setup fees.
How the costs compare
Rest charges around 0.85% per year on the default Core Strategy option (core strategy option, all-in.). That percentage applies to your entire balance — so the dollar cost rises every year as your fund grows.
easySMSF charges a fixed monthly fee for full SMSF administration and the annual audit. The percentage you pay shrinks every year as the fund grows. The crossover — where an SMSF starts costing less than Rest in absolute dollars — sits at roughly $150,000 combined member balance.
Beyond cost, the bigger story is what you can actually hold. Rest restricts you to pre-built investment options (and at best a 'member direct' platform with asset-class caps). An SMSF lets you hold direct ASX and global shares, residential and commercial property, ETFs, term deposits, bullion and crypto — all in the fund's own name.
- Rest default fee: ~0.85% per year on your full balance
- easySMSF fee: fixed monthly — shrinks as a percentage as your balance grows
- Crossover balance: about $150,000 combined
- Rest pro: Long history; broad membership; stable default returns
- Rest pro: Member Tailored allows ASX 300 + ETFs
- Rest pro: Low admin fee on small balances
- Rest limit: Percentage fees compound aggressively above $200k
- Rest limit: Single-share concentration capped at 20%
- Rest limit: No direct property, no LRBA, no crypto, no global brokerage